Cited By
View all- van Dijk TZaytsev V(2024)The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Project-Based LearningBridging the Gap Between AI and Reality10.1007/978-3-032-01377-4_3(48-76)Online publication date: 30-Oct-2024
AI in CS Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Pitfalls to Avoid
Author: 
Frank VahidAuthors Info & Claims
Frank VahidAuthors Info & Claims
Formats available
You can view the full content in the following formats:
References
[1]
Adiguzel, T., Kaya, M.H. and Cansu, F.K., Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15 (3), 2003, p.ep429.
[2]
Aulck, L., Velagapudi, N., Blumenstock, J. and West, J., 2016. Predicting student dropout in higher education. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06364.
[3]
College Student Advocates criticizes over-reliance on new AI-detection tools. College Student Advocates, https://www.collegestudentadvocates.org/post/college-student-advocates-criticizes-over-reliance-on-new-ai-detection-tools; accessed 2024 Aug 1.
[4]
Crawford, J., Allen, K.A., Pani, B. and Cowling, M., When artificial intelligence substitutes humans in higher education: the cost of loneliness, student success, and retention. Studies in Higher Education, 2024 pp.1--15.
[5]
Denny, P., Leinonen, J., Prather, J., Luxton-Reilly, A., Amarouche, T., Becker, B.A. and Reeves, B.N.,. Prompt Problems: A new programming exercise for the generative AI era. In Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, March 2024, v. 1 (pp. 296--302).
[6]
Fowler, M., Chen, B., Azad, S., West, M. and Zilles, C., 2021, March. Autograding" Explain in Plain English" questions using NLP. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 1163--1169).
[7]
Fowler, G. What to do when you're accused of AI cheating. Washington Post, Aug 14, 2023, https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/08/14/prove-false-positive-ai-detection-turnitin-gptzero/; accessed 2024 Aug 1.
[8]
General, U.S., 2023. Our epidemic of loneliness and isolation. The US Surgeon General's Advisory on the Healing Effects of Social Connection and Community 2023.
[9]
Gradescope, AI-assisted answer groups; https://help.gradescope.com/article/mv8qkiux00-instructor-assignment-ai-grading-answer-groups. Accessed 2023 Dec.
[10]
Hazzan, O. and Erez, Y., Generative AI in Computer Science Education. In Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education 2024
[11]
Irons, A. and Elkington, S., Enhancing learning through formative assessment and feedback. Routledge, 2001.
[12]
Leiser, F., Eckhardt, S., Knaeble, M., Mädche, A., Schwabe, G. and Sunyaev, A., From ChatGPT to FactGPT: A Participatory Design Study to Mitigate the Effects of Large Language Model Hallucinations on Users. Proceedings of Mensch und Computer, 2023.
[13]
Li, R., Che Hassan, N. and Saharuddin, N., College Student's Academic Help-Seeking Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review. Behavioral Sciences, 2023, 13 (8), p.637.
[14]
Li, T.W., Hsu, S., Fowler, M., Zhang, Z., Zilles, C. and Karahalios, K., 2023. Am I Wrong, or Is the Autograder Wrong? Effects of AI Grading Mistakes on Learning.
[15]
.Messer, M., Brown, N.C., Kölling, M. and Shi, M., Machine Learning-Based Automated Grading and Feedback Tools for Programming: A Meta-Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education June 2023 v. 1 (pp. 491--497).
[16]
Muller, D.A., Bewes, J., Sharma, M.D. and Reimann, P., Saying the wrong thing: Improving learning with multimedia by including misconceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 2008, pp.144--155.
[17]
Porter, L., Learn AI-assisted Python Programming: With GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT. Simon and Schuster, 2024
[18]
Price, T.W., Liu, Z., Cateté, V. and Barnes, T., August. Factors influencing students' help-seeking behavior while programming with human and computer tutors. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on international computing education research, 2017, (pp. 127--135).
[19]
Sadler, D.R., Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional science, 1989, 18, pp.119--144.
[20]
Smith IV, D.H., Emeka, C., Fowler, M., West, M. and Zilles, C., Investigating the Effects of Testing Frequency on Programming Performance and Students' Behavior. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, March 2003, v. 1 (pp. 757--763).
[21]
Sweller, J. and Cooper, G.A., The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and instruction, 1985, pp.59--89.
[22]
Vahid, F., Areizaga, L., Pang, A. ChatGPT and Cheat Detection in CS1 Using a Program Autograding System. Whitepaper, 2023, https://www.zybooks.com/research-items/chatgpt-and-cheat-detection-in-cs1-using-a-program-autograding-system/; accessed 2024 Aug 1.
[23]
Zilles, C.B., West, M., Herman, G.L. and Bretl, T., Every University Should Have a Computer-Based Testing Facility. In CSEDU (1) May 2019 (pp. 414--420).
Index Terms
- AI in CS Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Pitfalls to Avoid
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Graduate Programs in CS Education: Why 2020 is the Right Time
SIGCSE '20: Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationOpportunities for training CS K-12 pre-service and in-service teachers, research in CS Education, and career pathways for PhDs/EdDs in CS education are happening, but often in an uncoordinated way. We advocate that now is the right time for CS and ...
Tackling the challenges of CS education
Chris Stephenson on the complex challenges that continue to plague the computer science education community.
Advancing Opportunities for CS Teachers: How To Best Support Professional Development for Experienced Teachers in K-12 CS Education
SIGCSE 2022: Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2In K-12 education, nearly all efforts focused on expanding computer science education center on the induction of new computer science teachers, with very little attention given to support the ongoing needs of experienced computer science teachers. More ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
September 2024
53 pages
Copyright © 2024 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 21 August 2024
Published in INROADS Volume 15, Issue 3
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Brief-report
Funding Sources
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 957Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)806
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)30
Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- van Dijk TZaytsev V(2024)The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Project-Based LearningBridging the Gap Between AI and Reality10.1007/978-3-032-01377-4_3(48-76)Online publication date: 30-Oct-2024
View Options
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderDigital Edition
View this article in digital edition.
Digital EditionMagazine Site
View this article on the magazine site (external)
Magazine SiteLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in
PDF
Comments
There are no comments at this time.